DryerGuerrero463

Aus Wikipedia zur Industriegeschichte Dorsten

This is a subject that everyone appears to be arguing about at the moment. Every person attempting to second-guess Google's actions - which they will By no means do - and questioning no matter whether reciprocal linking is dead, dying or if it is a thing worth carrying on. 'Nuff of the speculation. Here's the proof. Google do not like reciprocal link directories and they can sniff a single out a mile off. There was (notice the use of the past tense right here) a link directory on my website until recently, but I have now removed it, simply because it had turn out to be as helpful as a chocolate teapot. While the major front page of the web site has retained it is Google PageRank of PR5, in one of their last updates, Google relegated that directory, which had also previously had a PR5, to a PR . Meanwhile, I had not altered my linking structure that pointed to it. I had not altered my policies either: I did not link TO any PR0 internet sites, kept the number of links per page down to a minimum and there were even text descriptions for each entry listed. Google could tell what it was and acted as they saw fit. There is no point questioning or whining about it. They can and they are doing so in order to supply better results to searchers. You can like it or lump it, but if you want them to give you decent listings, ranks or send you any site visitors, their rules count. My assistance: forget *artificial* reciprocal linking completely. The time taken to maintain the directory, approve/disaprove submissions (largely the latter, due to the fact the only individuals still asking for links are crappy PR0 internet sites and spammers) can be a lot much better spent. When you want to exchange links with other web sites, make positive you do so in a natural way, by which I mean write about the other internet site in some way and spot all-natural links inside the physique text. And contemplate just giving to get. By which I mean, link out to beneficial items for the edification or entertainment of your guests giving no consideration to the instant usefulness of that link to you. What goes around will come around. As soon as you are observed as helpful, others will link to you. You do then get your links "reciprocated", but it could not be from the very same men and women to whom you linked. That is the all-natural way of linking that Google wants to see. Do not, under any circumstances, keep something (other than internal navigation) that could look like merely a list of links / link farm, since Google will find it, will not like it and will penalize it. Reciprocal linking, in the form of lists or directories merely created for that quite purpose can't do anything to help you with Google (fairly the opposite, in truth) and therefore, est mortuus. [RIP] drip feed