HershWyatt317

Aus Wikipedia zur Industriegeschichte Dorsten

This is a topic that everybody appears to be arguing about at the moment. Every person attempting to second-guess Google's actions - which they will In no way do - and wondering whether or not reciprocal linking is dead, dying or if it is one thing worth carrying on. 'Nuff of the speculation. Here's the proof. Google do not like reciprocal link directories and they can sniff 1 out a mile off. There was (notice the use of the past tense here) a link directory on my website till lately, but I have now removed it, simply because it had grow to be as valuable as a chocolate teapot. While the major front page of the website has retained it is Google PageRank of PR5, in a single of their last updates, Google relegated that directory, which had also previously had a PR5, to a PR . Meanwhile, I had not altered my linking structure that pointed to it. I had not altered my policies either: I did not link TO any PR0 web sites, kept the number of links per page down to a minimum and there had been even text descriptions for each and every entry listed. Google could tell what it was and acted as they saw fit. There is no point wondering or whining about it. They can and they are doing so in order to supply better outcomes to searchers. You can like it or lump it, but if you want them to give you decent listings, ranks or send you any targeted traffic, their guidelines count. My guidance: forget *artificial* reciprocal linking completely. The time taken to preserve the directory, approve/disaprove submissions (mainly the latter, due to the fact the only people nevertheless asking for links are crappy PR0 websites and spammers) can be a lot much better spent. When you want to exchange links with other internet sites, make positive you do so in a natural way, by which I mean write about the other internet site in some way and spot natural links within the body text. And take into account just giving to get. By which I mean, link out to beneficial issues for the edification or entertainment of your guests giving no consideration to the instant usefulness of that link to you. What goes around will come about. Once you are noticed as beneficial, other people will link to you. You do then get your links "reciprocated", but it could not be from the same folks to whom you linked. That is the all-natural way of linking that Google wants to see. Do not, under any circumstances, sustain anything (other than internal navigation) that could look like merely a list of links / link farm, since Google will locate it, will not like it and will penalize it. Reciprocal linking, in the form of lists or directories merely developed for that quite purpose can not do something to help you with Google (very the opposite, in fact) and as a result, est mortuus. [RIP] contextual backlinks